Maybe that means, not for sure. Just your assumptions. Let’s see everything together and everyone for himself from all answers will compile priorities for himself.

Maybe that means, not for sure. Just your assumptions. Let’s see everything together and everyone for himself from all answers will compile priorities for himself.

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

Well, all not all or two, but the understanding of the nature of gravity and the nature of energy will make it possible to make an unimaginable breakthrough in natural science. Unless, of course, this is not the same question, only in different aspects. The solution to such a problem can put a person on a par with the highest beings of the universe.

In my opinion, this question is: “What question can be in physics (one), which when answering, you can guess everything else?” And you have already asked this question. :-).

In my opinion, this question is: “What question can be in physics (one), which when answering, you can guess everything else?” And you have already asked this question. :-).

Previously, an erroneous opinion prevailed that there is a certain universal formula, a special physical law, knowing which, one can literally predict, the future. The movement of the substance. The formula in which everything is included. With the emergence and development of synergetics, quantum mechanics, it became clear that such a universal law, most likely, was not.

It is necessary to formulate not a question, but the conditions of the problem. It is necessary not to answer the question, but to solve the problem. Condition of the problem: create such an invariant of reality that will prove itself. As the solution to this problem, we will find out that this invariant must be complete and internally agreed. I am a rather difficult consistent and local theory not It may be complete – gydel. We conclude that it is impossible to solve this problem using a rational methodology and the need to search for an irrational solution. Returning a little more than 100 years ago – “before Gödel”, we will find that rational science also tried to find an invariant and ensure verification by constructing a complete and internally coordinated model of the world. Conditioning the task is the same. The first attempt to solve this problem through the postulation of four rational dogmas was unsuccessful. Thus, we will answer the question of the mathematical foundation of science, in general, physics, in particular. Physics arises at the stage of interpretation of a mathematical invariant in terms of physics. If a mathematical model, now Already, it proves itself, then the transition from such mathematics to physics occurs through the formulation of hypotheses. The basic hypothesis may look as follows: the complete and self -sufficient mathematical model is not clear what the original is equivalent to matter, as the original. Physics can arrange the colors of this hypothesis, correcting any existing physical theories and building new ones. The onlyness of the complete and self -sufficient mathematical model remains in question: maybe whether, for example, matter to exist in a different form? By the way, the invariant describes a universal form that localizes any content that can be materialized. Next we will see that the full model … is open. The full model is emergency, that is, he answers questions. It is not a model that arises from the description – from the terms, but we describe the model, looking for suitable terms to describe the existing model. If the original is not defined in some area, for example, the model inherits precisely such properties. The independence between some parameters in the original is fully inherited by the model. The infinities found in the model inside the local form of matter turn out to be described as they are represented in the original. Those. The problem with the “demon of infinity” is also solved, like many other problems. The full model (presumably) is discovered by the region of the current present, the independence of the light, the quanta. The shedding quanta and recalling the paradox of the “quantum teleportation”, we will ask ourselves about the “non -classical” information. Next, we will move on to research in the field of the intangible part of the still objective reality, where the transmission of information is not related to the transfer of energy. Next we generalize the model of objective reality and try to develop it to the model of subjective reality. Subjective reality is full, it is not supplemented objective. We are talking about the following level of the hierarchy. We cannot fully explore the field of subjective reality, we will not be able to build its full model, unlike the model of matter. Next, we will move on to the development of accumulated knowledge in the field of collective (social) reality. This area is also full – at the next level of the hierarchy. Here we are interested in the laws of the sustainable development of society, which we formulate based on previously gained knowledge. At the moment, we do not know these laws, and do not know, respectively, on what principles to build society.

Do you know physics? In many ways, Perelman’s wonderful book is still relevant, for those who look at the world with an inquisitive look, wanting to comprehend his laws. The author offers a unique quiz in physics, answering the questions of which you can look at ordinary things and familiar phenomena from a new side.

“How did it all start?” Of course. But the rules are obliged to finish. I think you can find other such questions. But why do you think that one question is easier to answer than 1000? 🙂